(not all of them obviously, just one or two). So I was thinking I could settle for a cropped lens for now. I wondered if any of you have had experience in using APS-C lenses in crop mode on one of the a7's? If so, how does your IQ compare? Pros and cons? Obviously I am saving up for the full frame options, but the 16-35 2.8 is quite the chunk of cash. I used to have an a6000 and liked it, but I switched to canon for the 6Dmkii and am now switching back (finally). While there are others that you could be gandering at, most of them aren't this tiny and light.Hey guys! Well my a7iii is ordered.but BACKordered!!! Can't stand it I just want the thing!!! Im sure some of you can relate.Īnyways, I have been searching long and hard for lens options, and while I love Sony's full frame, I have to say that the lens options aren't quite as nice as the APS-C selection. In that case, the 11mm F/1.8 is definitely something worth considering as your next purchase.Īnd as previously mentioned - if you are shooting Sony for a frame, like the A74, these lenses are also an option for those looking for multiple compact lenses with virtually no weight added to the bag. Suppose you're looking for an ultra-wide lens, like for vlogging. Though, like I said, the one that really impressed me the most was the 11mm. It's absolutely fantastic in image quality, it's definitely bigger and heavier than this one, but it's also significantly less expensive. Lens from Sigma instead, even though it doesn't have all the bells and whistles this new 15mm does. I'll probably continue to suggest the 16mm F1.4. However, investments are always something to consider, and contemplation often differs from creative to creative.Īs far as that 15mm lens goes, it didn't offer the "wow" factor I was personally seeking, and its shortcomings didn't match up with the steep price point. Now, I'm not here to say that one lens is better than the other or that one brand is superior to the next. And while they offer incredible image quality, it's likely easier to save that money and go with another brand. It's entirely up to you if you're willing to pay the price. This isn't a new con in the camera world, particularly when it comes to Sony lenses, as they tend to be much more expensive than their competitors. Perhaps the biggest hangup I have are the prices. They offer decent image quality with updated features that work wonderfully with the newer Sony camera bodies. They're incredibly small, very light, and so compact that one could throw all of them in your bag and barely notice a difference. So, what are my personal recommendations for someone who is looking into these lenses?īottom line - all three of these lenses performed pretty well and did exactly what they're supposed to do. While it's significantly more expensive than the Sigma lens, I thought this one would be the one of the three to blow me away - but the surprise came from the 11mm instead.įinal Thoughts: Which Lens Is Right For You? With the sigma lens coming in at about USD 400 or CAD 519 - this 15mm lens comes in at USD 750 or 4950 CAD. In turn, I get this funny feeling that they threw these extra features on there to make it worth its steeper price over Sigma's current competitor. However, I've noticed they've been putting these updated features on all the recent lenses, regardless of pro status. All these extra bells and whistles are typically what we see on Sony's more professional-level lenses. We also have a customizable button and an autofocus/manual focus toggle switch. You've got a dedicated aperture ring on this lens and the ability to make it click or unclick. This one is much smaller and lighter for a long day's shoot than the Sigma and includes some extra bells and whistles. I've been recommending the signal lens to many creatives for years, and it is one of the most popular APS-C lenses. This is a direct competitor to the Sigma 16mm wide lens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |